Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 16:55:45 -0500 (EST) From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com> To: Mike Fisher <mfisher@csh.rit.edu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on necessity of tcp_wrappers port Message-ID: <14458.21857.556843.401185@onceler.kcilink.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0001101637450.372-100000@res112b-165.rh.rit.edu> References: <14458.20230.797957.124407@onceler.kcilink.com> <Pine.BSF.4.20.0001101637450.372-100000@res112b-165.rh.rit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "MF" == Mike Fisher <mfisher@csh.rit.edu> writes: MF> The port should still live for the people staying with legacy FreeBSD MF> systems, though, IMO. I agree, however I think it should be marked clearly as such, and probably removed from the packages included on current releases, so as to limit confusion. But aren't ports not guaranteed to work on older than current OS releases? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14458.21857.556843.401185>