From owner-freebsd-current  Thu May  9 09:57:02 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA23046
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 9 May 1996 09:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA23041
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 9 May 1996 09:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.5/8.6.9) id JAA21208; Thu, 9 May 1996 09:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 09:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199605091656.JAA21208@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: terry@lambert.org
CC: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, current@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199605081838.LAA26483@phaeton.artisoft.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Wed, 8 May 1996 11:38:50 -0700 (MST))
Subject: Re: NFS in -current is _BUSTED_
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * On a hunch: try backing out the bcopy optimizations?

What, someone's actually using THAT in their kernel???  Or libc???

In case people are not reading their messages, the bcopy thread is me
writing a small subroutine and asking people to test it by linking it
into a binary.

It won't automatically infect your kernel or libc, unless I just
invented a new virus. :)

Satoshi "please don't blame me for everything that's going wrong" Asami