From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 11 14:59:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA12540 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:59:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA12535 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:59:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA27964 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:58:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 17:58:56 -0500 (EST) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: status of NFS? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG An addendum... Any idea what causes this? root@shell[/home/spork]# mount /dev/sd0s1a on / (local) /dev/sd0s1d on /tmp (local, nodev, nosuid) /dev/sd0s1e on /usr (local, nodev) /dev/sd0s1f on /usr/local (local, nodev, nosuid) /dev/sd0s1g on /usr/local/tars (local, nodev, nosuid) /dev/sd0s1h on /var (local, nodev, nosuid) /dev/sd1s1e on /staff (NFS exported, local, nodev) /dev/sd1s1f on /home (NFS exported, local, nodev, nosuid) procfs on /proc (local) 10.0.0.1:/var/mail on /var/mail (nodev, noexec, nosuid) 10.0.0.1:/var/mail on /var/mail (nodev, noexec, nosuid) 10.0.0.1:/var/mail on /var/mail (nodev, noexec, nosuid) ??? Weird. Charles --- Charles Sprickman spork@super-g.com --- On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, spork wrote: > Hi, > > We're getting ready to replace two important production machines running > 2.1.7.1 with two running our stable snap (980825). We currently run nfs > between them to allow shell users to read mail locally (yes, I know about > IMAP, but the solution we have works well now...). Basically the mail > server export /var/mail to the shell machine and the shell machine exports > /home so user's procmailrc's can be read, etc. NFS is over a private > 100Mb network on a second nic. > > I'd just like to get a feel from everyone as to what the best options for > NFS in this situation are. Right now, even with "soft" and "intr" flags, > I get un-killable processes should one of the mounts go away. Generally, > reboots are required to get everything back in sync after a failure. I'm > now using a line like so: > > 10.0.0.1:/var/mail /var/mail nfs > rw,bg,intr,soft,nfsv3,tcp,nosuid,nodev,noexec > > Looking at the archives, people seem to have better luck with v2 over udp. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Charles > > --- > Charles Sprickman > spork@super-g.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message