Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 12:11:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lp64 vs lp32 printf Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210091210200.14413-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20021009161756.E4040-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > > Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes: > > > > > > What's the accepted way to printf something (like sizeof()) which > > > boils down to "unsigned int" on x86 and "unsigned long" on the LP64 > > > platforms? > > > > In userland you can use %z for printing size_t's. In the kernel, > > casting to intmax_t/uintmax_t and using %j is correct. > > Um, using intmax_t to print size_t's would be incorrect, since it is > signed. Using uintmax_t would be bloat. Very few typedefed types > need the full bloat of [u]intmax_t, and size_t is unlikely to become > one of them before casting it to uintmax_t to print it becomes a style > bug in the kernel too (when %z is implemented). Ok, so back to Drew's original question. What's the accepted way (both kernel and user)? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0210091210200.14413-100000>