From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 1 13:14:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AF416A404; Tue, 1 May 2007 13:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5EB13C4B9; Tue, 1 May 2007 13:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 0FE591A4DA1; Tue, 1 May 2007 06:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 06:15:11 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Andrey Chernov , Mark Linimon , Roman Kurakin , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070501131511.GF13868@elvis.mu.org> References: <20070501002817.GA887@nagual.pp.ru> <463690FE.9000209@inse.ru> <20070501010709.GA1304@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501013957.GX13868@elvis.mu.org> <20070501064828.GA3836@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501083032.GA9361@soaustin.net> <20070501084514.GA4889@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501113155.GD13868@elvis.mu.org> <20070501115133.GA6634@nagual.pp.ru> <20070501122246.GA7178@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070501122246.GA7178@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sysinstall main.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 13:14:39 -0000 * Andrey Chernov [070501 05:25] wrote: > On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:51:33PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > > Your query about bug reports is a straw man as anticipating > > > a lot of fallout which has already occured does not require > > > that I actually have a bug report. > > I can add that I expect _much_less_ fallouts from the ports since that > soft is already maked portable by their developers and is not local V7 > hacks rotten for years without touching, but you may disagree. That's why > we need some real stats first. Yes, however, typically(*) this is done pre-commit as a courtesy to the community both developer and consumer. (*) in my mind where people think about preserving some form of source/binary compatibility so that developing apps doesn't resemble some form of kangaroo court. -- - Alfred Perlstein