From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Sep 10 13:11:34 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77628108F3CF for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0087FF55 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C1E5E108F3CD; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A58108F3CC for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518F67FF53 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02F218812 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w8ADBW4Z013283 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w8ADBWFh013282 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 231277] dns/ddclient: perl SHEBANG wrong Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ohartmann@walstatt.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:11:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D231277 --- Comment #2 from O. Hartmann --- Why should I address something with upstream when it is clearly a fault of = the port maintenance? The original perl main program's shebang is #!/usr/bin/perl -w #!/usr/local/bin/perl -w ###################################################################### [...] and after application of the patch (tagged post-patch) it is #!/usr/local/bin/perl -w #!/usr/local/local/bin/perl -w ###################################################################### [...] as reported. And now: who is to blame? Upstream? The problem is identified rather quickly: post-patch: @${GREP} -lR '/usr' ${WRKSRC} | ${XARGS} ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e \ 's|/usr|${PREFIX}|g' It is surely more of a cosmetic question, but I'm not sure about nasty side effects. It should be fixed - locally at FreeBSD's, not upstream. But how do you think about the attached patch? Also cosmetic (I'd prefer /usr/bin/env -S perl -w )? Regards, oh --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=