From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 14 15:47:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2313816A419 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0138C13C47E for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) Received: from [63.251.67.21] (rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com [63.251.67.21]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l8EFlEt5046568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:47:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@2hip.net) From: Robert Noland To: yousif@alumni.jmu.edu In-Reply-To: <1189777093.10875.5.camel@localhost> References: <1189718884.1358.55.camel@localhost> <1189721265.13714.12.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> <1189777093.10875.5.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-zlQNhthMrVrImczzvLPI" Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:47:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1189784828.13714.24.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new emerald in ports (0.5.2) + beryl = problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:47:31 -0000 --=-zlQNhthMrVrImczzvLPI Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 09:38 -0400, Yousif Hassan wrote: > > The beryl port will not move, in fact it will go away very soon. You > > need to be moving to compiz. All of the relevant parts are in the tree > > now. The 0.6.0 version of compiz-fusion is due any day now. >=20 > This is as I expected, and good news. Are the KDE components in there > now, or are those due in 0.6.0? I see that ccsm is in ports -- that's > great! I currently have KDE disabled in the compiz port, although I assume that it will still work. The integration components are currently missing. It is still not entirely clear to me which parts will be in 0.6.0 but there are new KDE integration bits in git. 0.6.0 is mostly a bugfix version of 0.5.2 and is what is expected to ship with 7.0 as well as several of the Linux distros... robert. > > heliodor is in ports, aquamarine is not. emerald is only a dependency > > of the metaport. >=20 > There are versions of aquamarine ports out there that can be used since > there isn't one officially checked in. I'm using one and it does work > flawlessly. If anyone's interested, a quick search of the x11 mailing > list archives will return some links. >=20 > Thanks, everyone, for your responses. >=20 > --y >=20 --=-zlQNhthMrVrImczzvLPI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBG6qzuM4TrQ4qfROMRArk4AJ9Yn3P/4SQlbsFjkQmwvNq0EYtXNACfR2+H f1EhpGiSBZoXat+yLJF42Xs= =FdBZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-zlQNhthMrVrImczzvLPI--