From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Sep 24 14:18:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF4F37B424; Sun, 24 Sep 2000 14:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newsguy.com (p04-dn01kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [211.0.245.5]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id GAA24755; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 06:18:39 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <39CE6F78.DF545ED@newsguy.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 06:17:44 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Watson Cc: Barry Pederson , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Snapshots in the Fast Filesystem References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robert Watson wrote: > > I won't address the other issues discussed in your email, although I do > have some thoughts on them, but will address this one. Snapshot files > have the SF_SNAPSHOT file flag set on them -- I believe this is not > cleared by ufs_getattr() and hence is probably exposed via stat(). I'm > not sure our ls -ol output understands the snapshot flag, but a custom > modification to ls, or a manual tool for stating and identifying files > with the flag set sounds like it should work. That said, I haven't tried > this :-). In addition to ls, find could make good use of understanding said flag. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.secret.bsdconspiracy.net "I demand that my picture show a handsome face, even if it doesn't look like me." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message