From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Nov 24 13:17:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA07623 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:17:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from maila.telia.com (maila.telia.com [194.236.189.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA07607 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:17:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from s.lindgren@telia.com) Received: from d1o49.telia.com (root@d1o49.telia.com [195.198.194.241]) by maila.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA04702; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 22:17:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from prutten (t5o49p24.telia.com [195.198.195.24]) by d1o49.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA23807; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 22:17:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <000401be17f0$98914640$18c3c6c3@prutten> Reply-To: "Stefan Lindgren" From: "Stefan Lindgren" To: , Subject: SV: SV: puh!(PC hardware) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 22:22:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id NAA07617 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In the output of mptable the CPU's looks identical. (6,1,9, 0xfbff) As soon as I put the other one in(doesn't matter wich of them)the other slot, I can't do a make depend. Could the system(read PCI/ISA IDE bridge) get kinda "overloaded" when I run Dual CPU and IDE drives? Does anybody know of a cheap reseller of UWSCSI drives with overseas shipping? Syprix AB Stefan Lindgren UNIX System Consultant Phone: +46 709 220 770 -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Rob Schofield Till: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Datum: den 24 november 1998 20:58 Ämne: Re: SV: puh!(PC hardware) >Stefan Lindgren wrote: >> >> Hi again. >> >> Just remvoved the second CPU. Works like a charm.:-( >> >> Any ideas?(blown CPU?) >> Some special, hidden APIC I/O config? > >Different stepping of each CPU, rather than the same? > >And before everyone says "Old wives's tale", I have just had recent (and >*very expensive*) experience that this needs to be the case - the same >stepping, that is. Under NT I was getting blue screens and all sorts of >weird stuff; under FBSD I was getting failure to shutdown, corrupted >disks, downright disobedience at the command line, "freezes" in X, and >other weirdness. Both processors changed for the same stepping, and >*ping* (magic wand noise) all fixed.... > >Rob Schofield >-- >The Ninety-Ninety Rule of Project Scheduling: > >The first ninety percent of the job takes ninety percent of the >allotted time, the last ten percent takes the other ninety percent. > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message