From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 23:53:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE2716A4CE for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:53:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492BC43D54 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:53:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iB1Nrlaa095051 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:53:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id iB1NrlWY095048; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:53:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:53:47 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200412012353.iB1NrlWY095048@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Jason C. Wells" In-Reply-To: <98CE9C0241F1FC59BB8F0547@[192.168.1.16]> References: <41AE3F80.1000506@freebsd.org> <98CE9C0241F1FC59BB8F0547@[192.168.1.16]> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 13:34:34 +0000 cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: My project wish-list for the next 12 months X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:53:49 -0000 < said: > This sounds very close to OpenAFS. I don't know what distinguishes a SAN > from other types of NAS. OpenAFS does everything you mentioned in the > above paragraph. OpenAFS _almost_ works on FreeBSD right now. AFS's consistency model is wholly unsuitable for clustering. -GAWollman