Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 12:59:54 +0100 (MET) From: Thomas Gellekum <thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de, FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a kvetch and a proposal Message-ID: <199512271159.MAA26561@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: <199512222218.OAA02769@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Dec 22, 95 02:18:37 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Satoshi Asami wrote: > > The ports don't like to go to two subtrees. It's much easier to let > the user look at /usr/local or /usr/X11R6 depending on where the > binary is, than let an X port/package install something in /usr/local, > since this tree can move around. ;) You may not be aware of it, but thanks for the support. :-) > The only thing we need to agree at this point is the name of the > variable, we can include it to bsd.port.mk later if that is more > desirable. Is NOPORTDOCS ok for everyone? I'd prefer it in /etc/make.conf, like NOMANCOMPRESS. tg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512271159.MAA26561>