Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:31:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: reason for "magic" crashes. Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206242130330.73860@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120624190853.GB15899@dft-labs.eu> References: <20120623162415.303430@gmx.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206231947160.40095@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206241856090.73001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120624180526.GA15899@dft-labs.eu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206242049230.73675@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120624190853.GB15899@dft-labs.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Are you asking about overhead of DDB or all debug options? all. invariants, witness etc. > > I don't think that DDB support can be accounted for slowdown. > > As for the rest, it's hard to say. I guess it depends on your workload, > also I never performed any benchmarks to compare this and I'm unaware of > any. > > In other words, you have to test it yourself. we will see.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206242130330.73860>