From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 24 19:30:57 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AEE1065675
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:30:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E46E8FC0C
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:30:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5OJV1JY073864;
	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:31:01 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5OJV0Xr073861; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:31:00 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:31:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120624190853.GB15899@dft-labs.eu>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206242130330.73860@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <20120623162415.303430@gmx.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206231947160.40095@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206241856090.73001@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120624180526.GA15899@dft-labs.eu>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206242049230.73675@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120624190853.GB15899@dft-labs.eu>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 21:31:01 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: reason for "magic" crashes.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:30:58 -0000

>
> Are you asking about overhead of DDB or all debug options?
all. invariants, witness etc.

>
> I don't think that DDB support can be accounted for slowdown.
>
> As for the rest, it's hard to say. I guess it depends on your workload,
> also I never performed any benchmarks to compare this and I'm unaware of
> any.
>
> In other words, you have to test it yourself.

we will see.