Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:34:49 -0400 From: Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: Michael Hughes <michael.hughes@gmx.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: bacula-client-3.0.0_1 Message-ID: <20090501203449.GA4495@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <49FB58C6.4070804@langille.org> References: <49FB4131.7010400@gmx.com> <49FB58C6.4070804@langille.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:17:10PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michael Hughes wrote: > > Where did the 2.x series ports go? We currently use bacula-dir v. 2.4.4 > > on a linux host to backup our fbsd file servers, but some web research > > and our own testing on our fbsd test file server found that > > bacula-client v. 3.x is completely incompatible with bacula-dir < 2.5.x. > > Have you raised this issue on the bacula users mailing list? If so, > what is the URL into the archives so we can investigate. > > > Currently our production file servers have the bacula-client v. 2.4.4 > > port installed, but we would like to be able to port upgrade them and > > still maintain a 2.4.x series bacula-client. > > I'm sure that's possible, not trivial, but possible. > > > I have searched through the cvs commits using the online FreeBSD ports > > search tool, but I found that there is a version jump from bacula-client > > v. 1.38.x to version 3.x. Yet, we originally installed the 2.4.4 client > > on our fbsd file servers using a port, so clearly at some point there > > was a 2.4.4 port. > > bacula-client is a slave port of bacula-server. Thus, changes to > baucla-client version numbers can be gleaned from bacula-server. sysutils/bacula-server is currently 3.0.0 and sysutils/bacula-server-devel is 2.5.42.b2. > If you need the 2.x branch, get it from CVS. You'll need both the slave > and the master. The latest in the 2.x line of development is actually in bacula-server-devel right now. > Perhaps a 2.x port is a good idea. A PR would be useful. And perhaps a > repo copy. The versions are backwards for now, but I imagine -devel will be updated in the future to be the latest development release. At that time we can prepare the bacula2 ports which will track the 2.x line of development. -- WXS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090501203449.GA4495>