From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  6 11:29:47 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9995C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org>;
	Thu,  6 Jan 2005 11:29:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mongers.org (miracle.mongers.org [193.162.142.71])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1FEC43D1D
	for <freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org>;
	Thu,  6 Jan 2005 11:29:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jlouis@mongers.org)
Received: (qmail 21097 invoked by uid 1030); 6 Jan 2005 11:29:44 -0000
From: "Jesper Louis Andersen" <jlouis@mongers.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:29:44 +0100
To: Igor Shmukler <shmukler@mail.ru>
Message-ID: <20050106112944.GA30825@miracle.mongers.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0501060218130.23976@rfhpc8317>
	<E1CmNlA-0008C3-00.shmukler-mail-ru@f7.mail.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1CmNlA-0008C3-00.shmukler-mail-ru@f7.mail.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
cc: Hubert Feyrer <hubert@feyrer.de>
cc: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:29:47 -0000

Quoting Igor Shmukler (shmukler@mail.ru):

[Microbenchmarks doesn't work]

Do you have a reference to the real-world benchmark you mention? It 
could be interesting to redo the work with a NetBSD 2.0 kernel, now
it is official.

-- 
jlouis