From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Oct 31 15:36:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA13024
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 15:36:47 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from usr01.primenet.com (tlambert@usr01.primenet.com [206.165.6.201])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA13018
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 15:36:44 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tlambert@usr01.primenet.com)
Received: (from tlambert@localhost)
	by usr01.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA25088;
	Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:36:23 -0700 (MST)
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Message-Id: <199710312336.QAA25088@usr01.primenet.com>
Subject: Re: Small Problem with Linux Emul
To: kmitch@weenix.guru.org (Keith Mitchell)
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 23:36:22 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199710310428.XAA03075@weenix.guru.org> from "Keith Mitchell" at Oct 30, 97 11:28:25 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Other than you seriously digging, I have no answer; I can't repeat it.
> 
> Hmm, would it make a difference if I only ifconfiged one of the
> interfaces, yet left them both in the computer (they're on the
> same card).

Heh.  Ask the hardware, not me... 8-).

> Are you trying to replicate it with a quakeworld server or some
> generic Linux net application?

Generic.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.