From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 08:55:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4A416A4C0; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.wwireless.com (mail.wwireless.com [65.212.140.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEAB43FFD; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:55:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Russell.Hay@wwireless.com) Received: by WACORPMX1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:53:59 -0700 Message-ID: <6D6F0541E2B1D411A75B0002A513016D0ECC5054@wacorpml03.wwireless.com> From: "Hay, Russell" To: 'Larry Rosenman' , Mark Russell Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:53:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: "Hay, Russell" cc: "Sergey A. Osokin" Subject: RE: submitting a port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 15:55:18 -0000 Well that's just it.. it USED to have reverse DNS. Just this month, for some reason, they took it away. Of course, previously, their name servers weren't exactly the best in the world anyway.. and for a big company, they sure do have many problems.. -R -----Original Message----- From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:ler@lerctr.org] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:52 AM To: Mark Russell Cc: Hay, Russell; Sergey A. Osokin; ports@freebsd.org Subject: RE: submitting a port --On Tuesday, September 09, 2003 01:48:01 +1000 Mark Russell wrote: > On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote: > >> >> >> --On Monday, September 08, 2003 08:36:56 -0700 "Hay, Russell" >> wrote: >> >> > ahh All the bored college kids home from school? >> dunno who or why, but there was MASSIVE (I.E. 1000's of PR's) abuse, so >> they >> turned it off. >> >> It's a real shame :-( > > doesn't explain why they stopped accepting PR's from unresolved IP's > though, use your standard BL's but a blanket ban is stupid, like most > telco's Again, too much abuse. My mailserver whines a lot about no reverse DNS. Why can't the ISP in question just put up generic forward/reverse on their dynamic IP's? We (Internet America, Inc/Dallas, TX US/My Employer) do. LER > >> >> LER >> >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:ler@lerctr.org] >> > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:37 AM >> > To: Mark Russell; Sergey A. Osokin >> > Cc: ports@freebsd.org; Hay, Russell >> > Subject: Re: submitting a port >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > --On Tuesday, September 09, 2003 01:32:32 +1000 Mark Russell >> > wrote: >> > >> >> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 07:24:13AM -0700, Hay, Russell wrote: >> >>> > I'm trying to submit a new port using send-pr, but my ISP doesn't >> >>> > give reverse DNS for my IPs, and Postfix on freebsd.org will not >> >>> > allow mail unless it can do a reverse DNS look up on the IP. Is >> >>> > there another way to submit the PR to get a port added to the >> >>> > ports collection? Or someway around the IP address issue? >> >>> >> >>> Just talk with your ISP about reverse DNS lookup. >> >> >> >> And if your ISP is clueless like the dominant telco in .au? >> >> >> >> There is a web based send-pr somewhere on the fbsd site. >> > >> > Nope. It was turned off during the North American Summer due to >> > MASSIVE abuse. >> >> >> -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749