From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 19:40:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2764037B401 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3605343F3F for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:40:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h7C2eLJr077668 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:40:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)h7C2eLZu077665 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:40:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:40:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <002a01c36074$95dd3180$6d00a8c0@derwood2> Message-ID: <20030811223858.G77513@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <002a01c36074$95dd3180$6d00a8c0@derwood2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: RE: smp in 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 02:40:24 -0000 I guess I'll chime in as well... I have a Dual Athlon 2000+ MP here and it's running like a charm with SCHED_4BSD. Andy > Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > > Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, derwood wrote: > I've been running 5.1-Current since its release on a Dell Precision 410 with > dual P-III 500's > No SMP problems here at all.. Its been extremely stable for me thus far. > > Darin - > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steve Kargl > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:10 PM > To: Andy Farkas > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Eriq Lamar > Subject: Re: smp in 5.1 > > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote: > > > > > Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so > > > could someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual > > > system using mp's but not sure which version would be better. > > > > Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*). > > > > Stick with 4.8. > > > > * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd. > > Exact same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine. > > > > Strange. ULE has worked fine on my UP system for > several months and the SMP system I recently obtained > from a co-worker hasn't panicked while running ULE. > Can you drop into ddb and trace the problem with > ULE on your system? > > -- > Steve > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >