From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 12:42:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DADA16A4CE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:42:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from sun13.bham.ac.uk (sun13.bham.ac.uk [147.188.128.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B5343D66 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:42:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trigonometric@softhome.net) Received: from [147.188.128.127] (helo=bham.ac.uk) by sun13.bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1AoqJb-0005KH-00 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 20:41:35 +0000 Received: from sci-fs1.bham.ac.uk ([147.188.118.71]) by bham.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AoqJb-0006wi-9c for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 20:41:35 +0000 Received: from SPECULUSHX1THE not authenticated [147.188.140.72] Novell NetWare; Thu, 05 Feb 2004 20:41:35 +0000 Message-ID: <01e701c3ec28$71b61070$0601a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> From: "Jimmy Firewire" To: "Kris Kennaway" References: <00d901c3ec11$5a600ff0$0601a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE><20040205183346.GA18731@xor.obsecurity.org><01a201c3ec25$9a7156d0$0601a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> <20040205202914.GA25270@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:41:34 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RSA/DSA Host key generation didn't happen X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 20:42:26 -0000 >> I have just confirmed that on this box, it does not even attempt to setup >> the host keys, >> or run sshd at startup, is this supposed to happen? >You do have sshd enabled, right? OK, I was being completely stupid. sshd wasn't enabled, I was just so used to it being enabled by default. I think it's a good idea that it is not enabled by default however.But why take out sshd and not sendmail? Surely sendmail is more likely to be a problem than sshd? anonymousPseudonym (AP)