From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 19 13:50:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17935 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 13:50:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA17927 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 13:50:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA23320; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:50:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA00042; Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:50:17 -0600 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 14:50:17 -0600 Message-Id: <199810192050.OAA00042@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julian Elischer Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vote:? reversion of BDE change please? In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Please, if you know why I should not do this (or can lend weight > as to why I should) let me know! Because the interrupt mechanism need to become less ISA/x86 centric. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message