From owner-freebsd-current Mon Feb 25 10:35:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from green.bikeshed.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE81537B417; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (green@localhost) by green.bikeshed.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1PIZWo27986; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:35:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@green.bikeshed.org) Message-Id: <200202251835.g1PIZWo27986@green.bikeshed.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Logan weaponx" Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lomac In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 03 Feb 2002 03:50:03 +1100." From: "Brian F. Feldman" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:35:31 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Logan weaponx" wrote: > Is there a reason lomac_enable isn't in /etc/defaults/rc.conf? I've onl= y had = > a brief look so excuse this email if i'm in error and the answer is = > glaringly obvious. It's mostly that it still needs several features of the kernel which aren= 't = currently there to be fully-functionalI don't think there would be any ha= rm = in adding it, though, and saying as much in /etc/defaults/rc.conf :) -- = Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''= ''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org <> bfeldman@tislabs.com \ The Power to Serv= e! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,= ,,,,\ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message