Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:52:31 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore Message-ID: <48D0A92F.8010609@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080917052727.GA71514@FreeBSD.org> References: <200809151036.19674.jhb@freebsd.org> <48CEBE6E.1030508@FreeBSD.org> <48CFCE01.4050304@FreeBSD.org> <48D03248.1040109@FreeBSD.org> <20080917052727.GA71514@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Nevertheless, going back to rev. 1.559 of b.p.m. restores correct > behavior. Are you sure? I didn't try, but that commit seems to add new reasons to show up the dialog box while not removing any of the old ones. Running "make config-recursive" still works (and it calls recursively "make config-conditional" that works), so it seems john's analysis is correct, but I cannot figure how (and if) ever worked before. -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48D0A92F.8010609>