From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 01:37:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAE116A4CE; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:37:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706F943D41; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:37:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (cpe-24-24-233-222.socal.rr.com [24.24.233.222])i2U9bjUL008149; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:37:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62427FD0D1; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:37:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 81682-02; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:37:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [24.24.233.222] (mcneil.com [24.24.233.222]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009C4FD05D; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:37:44 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McNeil To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" In-Reply-To: <20040330030243.GB5757@madman.celabo.org> References: <1080334840.11426.12.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20040330023247.GA5637@madman.celabo.org> <1080614678.52004.5.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20040330030243.GB5757@madman.celabo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1080639464.81872.3.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:37:44 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nss_ldap broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:37:50 -0000 On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 19:02, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > Thanks! So, could you try the patch below? I think it is now > basically identical with what you posted, except for the changes to > nss_compat.c. After making a bone-head mistake and just installing the libc after a make update (duh!) I finally managed to salvage my system and give the patch a go. Things look good. I'm still concerned that nss_atexit can cause a seg11 if a nss_*.so.1 starts up any threads when the program isn't threaded otherwise. Don't really know why an nss plugin would want to do that, but it is hazardous. Sean