From owner-freebsd-security Wed Aug 22 6:53:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from magellan.palisadesys.com (magellan.palisadesys.com [192.188.162.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F9E37B40E; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:53:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ghelmer@palisadesys.com) Received: from mira (mira.palisadesys.com [192.188.162.116]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by magellan.palisadesys.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7MDrUh21840 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO); Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:53:30 -0500 From: "Guy Helmer" To: "Andrew R. Reiter" , "Eric Anderson" Cc: , , Subject: RE: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-01:55.procfs Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:55:16 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andrew R. Reiter [mailto:arr@watson.org] wrote > Hurm. I had assumed always that "security-officer" was more than one > person and that these people, not necesarily the FreeBSD "security team" > (if one wishes to call it that), should be those who review the > patch/advisory. Bah, perhaps I just hear things ... I am sure "security-officer" is more than one person but a little more "peer review" could apparently help the advisory process. Guy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message