From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Apr 24 23:37:15 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from jason.argos.org (a1-3b058.neo.rr.com [24.93.181.58])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2B8D737BCAC; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 23:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mike@argos.org)
Received: from localhost (mike@localhost)
	by jason.argos.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA09320;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 02:36:59 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 02:36:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Nowlin <mike@argos.org>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG,
	adoyle@viewsnet.com
Subject: Re: To MFC or not to MFC, that is the question.
In-Reply-To: <10801.956522360@zippy.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.10004250234130.9247-100000@jason.argos.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> personalities or styles.  In this case, I'd say it was a job for the
> CRC if we currently had one. :)


Does that make it a "CRC Check"?  :)

(Good old redundant-terminology Cyclical-Reduncancy-Check Checks.....)


mike




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message