From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 30 09:48:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407FF16A4CF for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9437743D3F for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:48:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 175 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2004 16:48:45 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Apr 2004 16:48:45 -0000 Message-ID: <4092836D.1020702@liwing.de> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:48:45 +0000 From: Jens Rehsack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040420 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <20040429160506.C89655D08@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: gnome@freebsd.org cc: vova@fbsd.ru Subject: Re: gnome-terminal real slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:48:54 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:05:06 -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >>> > maybe one of you can gave me a hint why my gnome-terminal is reacting >>> > real (and I mean waiting for a keystroke around 20 seconds) slow after >>> > I updated to Gnome 2.6. >>> ... >> My main question is whether this is FreeBSD specific or if it happens on >> Linux boxes, as well. > > It is slow on Linux too, there are plenty of Linux users that are > complaining about it too. ;-) Althought, it was a lot better than what > it was in GNOME 2.0 - 2.2. Not for me. gnome-terminal runs fine (a quite slow but fine) in 2.2, much better in 2.4 (especially around the time since ULE scheduler is in kernel and KSE is default thread library, but that doesn't need to be the reason), but it breaks down the starting speed and opening new tabs and switching between them since 2.6. So something must happened since there :-( Could it be that some package dependencies from x11/gnome2 to x11/gnome2-lite (that I've deinstalled when not required for gnome2-lite) can cause this sloppy reaction? Best regards, Jens