From owner-freebsd-java Mon Feb 19 14:22:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (c24-p99.senet.com.au [203.152.232.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F7F37B4EC for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA01288; Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:52:24 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from glewis) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:52:24 +1030 From: Greg Lewis To: Panagiotis Astithas Cc: java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porting the JDK Message-ID: <20010220085224.A1265@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20010219200539.B28982@netmode.ece.ntua.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010219200539.B28982@netmode.ece.ntua.gr>; from past@netmode.ntua.gr on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:05:39PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:05:39PM +0200, Panagiotis Astithas wrote: > I have been reading the Sun Community Source License for about > an hour now, but it is still not clear to me: if I were to begin > an effort to port the 1.3 jdk, would I be in violation of the > license, if I published the necessary patches on this list? My reading is yes, although I did this initially with 1.2.2 and I'm still alive :). Its fairly simple to set up something like I have for the 1.2.2 patches which requires people to agree to the SCSL before downloading them. This makes sure that everybody is happy. I hadn't actually noticed Sun had now released the 1.3 code for other than Windows till now! - Greg -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Mobile: 0419 868 494 Information Technology Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message