From owner-freebsd-current Wed Nov 13 18:10:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA04839 for current-outgoing; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 18:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA04796 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 18:10:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id RAA02572 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 1996 17:17:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.2/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id BAA17749; Thu, 14 Nov 1996 01:17:05 GMT Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 10:17:05 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: Mark Mayo , Terry Lambert , roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs is too slow? In-Reply-To: <199611122025.MAA25041@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I talked to a WinNT products manager at Veritas and this was his reply: ----- The Volume Manager will sit (optionally) under NTFS or FAT or whatever file systems someone is using on NT. It is optional in the sense that people will still use hard disk partitions for data that they may need to access from Win95 should they want/need to boot that OS. VxFS (which you mention in the subject line and later) is not part of the agreement with Microsoft, and is not yet being ported to NT. ----- Regards, Mike Hancock