From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jul 24 13:17:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from naboo.ethz.ch (naboo.ethz.ch [129.132.17.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A420837B401; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 13:17:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carlo@vis.ethz.ch) Received: by naboo.ethz.ch (Postfix, from userid 224) id 5E16E275B6; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Subject: GNU smalltalk, can't run version 1.96 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:17:13 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010724201713.5E16E275B6@naboo.ethz.ch> From: carlo@vis.ethz.ch (Carlo Dapor) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear fellow current people It is a quest for the Holy Grail I have embarked weeks ago. The harbours I have peered are: FreeBSD 4.3 and FreeBSD current. The last version I was able to build and run the tests is version 1.8.5, with some patches, both on 4.3 and current. But what I am not successfull with is neither with 1.96 or 1.95.x. I compiles on 4.3 and current, but at runtime I get a segfault. On 4.3, the offending showstopper is around the definition of primitive 184_185 (or similar), whereas on current it around the definition of primitive 203_204, I think. Interestingly, it compiles and runs smoothly on an SMP Linux 2.2.19. I also tried with gcc 3.0 on current, same result. Has anybody had more luck ? Tell me HOW, please. Ciao, derweil, -- Carlo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message