From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 20:12:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EEA16A4CF for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:12:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFAA43D4C for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:12:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040913201228.XPOB9204.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:12:28 -0400 From: "JJB" To: "Stefan Cars" , Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:12:27 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040913211740.Y71085@pluring.snowfall.se> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: RE: Sysadmin magazine benchmarkings X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 20:12:30 -0000 owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > Hi! > > I read the article on sys admin magazine > (http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1148/sam0107a/0107a.htm) where they > benchmarked Linux, Windows, Solaris and FreeBSD regarding > High-Performance Network Applications. This article is from 2001 and > covers FreeBSD 4.2. Anyhow, FreeBSD ended last which feels quiet > strange, is there anyone that has any new benchmarking data on how > FreeBSD 5 compares ? > > / Stefan This old artical has been covered in detail on this list when it first came out. You should check the FBSD questions archives first before you just post a question about something this old. No need to rehash history.