Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:38:23 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Final sanity pass: xdev Message-ID: <20090311083823.14600802dxfcspyo@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20090310.210746.1649765883.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20090310.210746.1649765883.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> (from Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:07:46 +0900 (JST)): > OK. I've had this reviewed before, and have been using variations of > this patch since 6.1. However, since it has been a while, I thought > I'd see if there were any objections before I committed this patch. No objections, just a "What about an else case with usage instructions when XDEV and XDEV_ARCH are not defined?". Bye, Alexander. -- It's not whether you win or lose but how you played the game. -- Grantland Rice http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090311083823.14600802dxfcspyo>