Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Jan 2020 23:28:02 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 243497] math/py-numpy: Fails to build with OpenBlas
Message-ID:  <bug-243497-21822-jQJhHyj1nv@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-243497-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-243497-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243497

--- Comment #33 from rsmith@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Steve Wills from comment #31)

The point that John Hein raises is a valid one; Numpy 1.16 is indeed the la=
st
release to support Python 2.7.

Looking at the numpy release notes, I'm not sure if there are significant
enough improvements between 1.16 and 1.18 to warrant leaving Python 2 users
without numpy. Although the support for OpenBlas with 8-byte integers might
appeal to those with huge datasets.

Additionally, there doesn't seem to be a huge uproar about the ports tree n=
ot
being on the latest stable numpy version. I only brought it up because in
principle it is good to stay current with important libraries like numpy.

So, maybe we should keep numpy at 1.16 until Python 2.7 expires at the end =
of
the year?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243497-21822-jQJhHyj1nv>