Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 23:28:02 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243497] math/py-numpy: Fails to build with OpenBlas Message-ID: <bug-243497-21822-jQJhHyj1nv@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-243497-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-243497-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243497 --- Comment #33 from rsmith@xs4all.nl --- (In reply to Steve Wills from comment #31) The point that John Hein raises is a valid one; Numpy 1.16 is indeed the la= st release to support Python 2.7. Looking at the numpy release notes, I'm not sure if there are significant enough improvements between 1.16 and 1.18 to warrant leaving Python 2 users without numpy. Although the support for OpenBlas with 8-byte integers might appeal to those with huge datasets. Additionally, there doesn't seem to be a huge uproar about the ports tree n= ot being on the latest stable numpy version. I only brought it up because in principle it is good to stay current with important libraries like numpy. So, maybe we should keep numpy at 1.16 until Python 2.7 expires at the end = of the year? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243497-21822-jQJhHyj1nv>