From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Jan 28 21:36:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE413CC6F90; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 21:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B207D2; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 21:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [10.30.35.155] (p5DDFAEF5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.223.174.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8E3F3F532; Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:36:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 22:36:05 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Martin Matuska cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r432594 - head/net-p2p/cpuminer In-Reply-To: <201701272103.v0RL36TG091383@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201701272103.v0RL36TG091383@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 21:36:17 -0000 On Fri, 27 Jan 2017, Martin Matuska wrote: > +.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGCC} > +# gcc yields higher hashrates on newer CPUs ^^^ That should be GCC (since about 2000 ;-). > +USE_GCC?= yes You make me curious: Do you happen to have any results with USE_GCC=6+ (or even USE_GCC=5+)? I'll try to get lang/gcc and USE_GCC=yes moved to GCC 5 in the coming month(s) and am wondering to what extent that might help further. Gerald