From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 25 21:34:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58492106566C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F4C8FC1C; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahj13 with SMTP id j13so356801lah.13 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:34:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:x-gm-message-state:content-type; bh=VWSDU88Id6q5P5ZyG9pGx0bFOqQ8RZXdM68aSp+R+r8=; b=GuuaLHLGN2itPaMkmM5lGX+nXdYrOoH1w0qANrP60u+2o0ZCE7x84TkbxAu2Rk/8Kh tE49yWPqAEY70RM+0s+QHT2hnN46SDyQxnLmi13efJxden4RFgPIPSnq1XXF5eBkhzbZ hsQoRWr6c8dQHYKZIXfpINWnb7U9tyo2bsV2Q= Received: by 10.112.82.226 with SMTP id l2mr4812883lby.102.1327527246132; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:34:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.25.196 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:33:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120125210459.GQ2726@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20120124183152.40c5c5af@atom.dino.sk> <20120125122123.GK2726@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120125205041.26aeef85@atom.dino.sk> <4F206D6A.3030302@FreeBSD.org> <20120125210459.GQ2726@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> From: Eitan Adler Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:33:35 -0500 Message-ID: To: Kostik Belousov X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn45bCBz8rmmWOimFKx96aqbtxH7gRY9KTIXzTTBqU4X4fL88iUMCt5JxVoR9wejYMf7mgG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andreas Tobler , Milan Obuch Subject: Re: nullfs broken on powerpc X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:34:08 -0000 On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > FWIW, it is not 'call doadump', it is just 'dump' for some time. > I think calling doadump does not work. Worked for me about a month ago but I could obviously be mistaken. :) Thanks for correcting me. -- Eitan Adler