From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jul 14 16:24:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from snafu.adept.org (adsl-63-201-63-44.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.201.63.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C869837BFDB for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:24:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@adept.org) Received: by snafu.adept.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73ED99EE01; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snafu.adept.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2A19B001; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:24:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:24:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: David Pick , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Displacement of Blame[tm] In-Reply-To: <20000714123827.A64184@mithrandr.moria.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 14 Jul 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > I don't think you understand. The stated problem is that people are > automatically counting advisories based on false assumptions. I think the problem is we're wasting an incredable amount of bandwidth over some individual's/group's false assumption(s) or general lack of clue. This thread isn't solving anything or helping anyone, but if you really, truly, honestly believe it is... How about moving it to -advocacy? It's become much more relevant to -advocacy than it is to -security. My -security bucket is swelling with banter that has very little [nothing] to do with the security of my FreeBSD system. -mrh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message