From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Dec 20 10:35:58 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA03060
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:35:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA03049;
          Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:35:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA14549; Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:35:03 -0800 (PST)
To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), dyson@FreeBSD.ORG,
        gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu, julian@whistle.com, bde@FreeBSD.ORG,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Bruce vandalism again 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 20 Dec 1997 09:34:39 EST."
             <199712201434.JAA00329@dyson.iquest.net> 
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 10:35:03 -0800
Message-ID: <14545.882642903@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Sorry, but most of us are real-world programmers, who try to keep our
> code ANSI.  (Then we have to switch into the mode: Oh yeah, we are still

You guys aren't even discussing the same subject here - is it any
wonder there's an argument?  John, please go back and read this thread
again because you've become lost in the weeds of a non-existant ANSI
vs non-ANSI debate.  This is a self-consistency debate here and you're
bringing the wrong debating points to the wrong argument. :)

					Jordan