From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 12:46:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3416A4CF for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:46:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-165-226-221.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.165.226.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED86943D77 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:46:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A0AA666D36; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:46:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 12:46:02 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jimmy Firewire Message-ID: <20040205204602.GA25685@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <00d901c3ec11$5a600ff0$0601a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> <20040205183346.GA18731@xor.obsecurity.org> <01a201c3ec25$9a7156d0$0601a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> <20040205202914.GA25270@xor.obsecurity.org> <01e701c3ec28$71b61070$0601a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01e701c3ec28$71b61070$0601a8c0@SPECULUSHX1THE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: RSA/DSA Host key generation didn't happen X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 20:46:55 -0000 --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:41:34PM +0000, Jimmy Firewire wrote: > >> I have just confirmed that on this box, it does not even attempt to se= tup > >> the host keys, > >> or run sshd at startup, is this supposed to happen? >=20 > >You do have sshd enabled, right? >=20 > OK, I was being completely stupid. sshd wasn't enabled, I was just so used > to it being enabled by default. I think it's a good idea that it is not > enabled by default however.But why take out sshd and not sendmail? Surely > sendmail is more likely to be a problem than sshd? AFAIK there's a config step in sysinstall which you may have omitted. Kris --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAIquKWry0BWjoQKURAkrHAJ9Sn7p+MJP2b+DaRDXqq2QtDKIeUgCeILXv zEKxf2kTexYqnTf7WzxDz88= =Mp1T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg--