From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  5 12:11:52 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE6616A41F;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2005 12:11:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org)
Received: from mail3out.barnet.com.au (mail3out.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.17])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB37743D62;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2005 12:11:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org)
Received: by mail3out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 27)
	id 2FD7F877C58; Mon,  5 Dec 2005 23:11:46 +1100 (EST)
X-Viruscan-Id: <43942E820000BC3F59E11E@BarNet>
Received: from mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (mail3.barnet.com.au [202.83.176.16])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "*.barnet.com.au",
	Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (verified OK))
	by mail3.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DFE877C55;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2005 23:11:46 +1100 (EST)
Received: from k7.mavetju (edwin-3.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.12.2])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "edwin.adsl.barnet.com.au",
	Issuer "BarNet Root Certificate Authority" (not verified))
	by mail3-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8A3877C54;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2005 23:11:45 +1100 (EST)
Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 59DB662B0; Mon,  5 Dec 2005 23:11:44 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 23:11:44 +1100
From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20051205121144.GN1239@k7.mavetju>
References: <200512050647.jB56lS17097786@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4393F39F.1060008@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4393F39F.1060008@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/wxgtk26-docs Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:11:52 -0000

On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 03:00:31AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> >edwin       2005-12-05 06:47:28 UTC
> >
> >  FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> >  Modified files:
> >    x11-toolkits/wxgtk26-docs Makefile 
> >  Log:
> >  update port: wxgtk26-docs
> >  
> >          Changed PORTNAME to wxgtk_doc_26 to remove duplicate latest
> >          link values with port wxgtk_doc.
> >  
> >  PR:             ports/89929
> >  Submitted by:   Matthias Sund <m.sund@arcor.de>
> >  
> >  Revision  Changes    Path
> >  1.2       +2 -2      ports/x11-toolkits/wxgtk26-docs/Makefile
> 
> I already added a LATEST_LINK to wxgtk24-docs. I suspect that a 
> LATEST_LINK in wxgtk24-docs is less obtrusive than a PORTNAME change in 
> wxgtk26-docs. And also, changing the PORTNAME of an established port 
> just to get a different LATEST_LINK value seems a bit overkill when you 
> can just set a LATEST_LINK value.

Undid the changes and added the LATETS_LINK.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@mavetju.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/