From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb  6 00:04:10 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E9316A418;
	Wed,  6 Feb 2008 00:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from attilio@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (repoman.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::29])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DC413C461;
	Wed,  6 Feb 2008 00:04:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from attilio@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from repoman.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m160495U028895;
	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:04:09 GMT
	(envelope-from attilio@repoman.freebsd.org)
Received: (from attilio@localhost)
	by repoman.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m160494G028894;
	Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:04:09 GMT (envelope-from attilio)
Message-Id: <200802060004.m160494G028894@repoman.freebsd.org>
From: Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:04:09 +0000 (UTC)
To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Cc: 
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_timeout.c subr_lock.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:04:10 -0000

attilio     2008-02-06 00:04:09 UTC

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:
    sys/kern             kern_timeout.c subr_lock.c 
  Log:
  Really, no explicit checks against against lock_class_* object should be
  done in consumers code: using locks properties is much more appropriate.
  Fix current code doing these bogus checks.
  
  Note: Really, callout are not usable by all !(LC_SPINLOCK | LC_SLEEPABLE)
  primitives like rmlocks doesn't implement the generic lock layer
  functions, but they can be equipped for this, so the check is still
  valid.
  
  Tested by: matteo, kris (earlier version)
  Reviewed by: jhb
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.109     +2 -2      src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c
  1.22      +2 -2      src/sys/kern/subr_lock.c