From owner-freebsd-smp Fri Aug 20 14:26:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp04.primenet.com (smtp04.primenet.com [206.165.6.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665FD14EE5 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:26:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert@usr09.primenet.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp04.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA22361; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:25:04 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr09.primenet.com(206.165.6.209) via SMTP by smtp04.primenet.com, id smtpdAAA2LayKR; Fri Aug 20 14:24:52 1999 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr09.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA14055; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:25:04 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199908202125.OAA14055@usr09.primenet.com> Subject: Re: SMP differences between -stable and -current (RE: wine and SMP) To: luoqi@watermarkgroup.com (Luoqi Chen) Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 21:25:04 +0000 (GMT) Cc: bruce@zuhause.mn.org, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199908202117.RAA16594@lor.watermarkgroup.com> from "Luoqi Chen" at Aug 20, 99 05:17:22 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > A threaded process *can* have multiple threads simultaneously on > multiple CPUs in -current, By this, you mean a _kernel_ threaded process, not a libc_r and libpthreads threaded process, right? > and I'm getting close on moving interrupt handling out of GKL, > that is, allowing multiple interrupts be serviced simultaneously. Go Loqui, go! Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message