From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 31 14:50:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F9F122 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:50:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [202.3.36.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E5AB04 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (77-64-237-200.dynamic.primacom.net [77.64.237.200]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C8EF386C57; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 03:22:20 +1100 (EST) References: <20130130001849.7669e033@ivory.lan> <20130130053729.0c9e018f@ivory.lan> <20130130110529.5c5df516@ivory.lan> <8EF6F73D-05AF-4E04-968B-84F35CD0FD85@ugh.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3C9D4DB2-33CE-4321-9B82-F0A1713591F0@ugh.net.au> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B144) From: Andrew Stevenson Subject: Re: disk wait mystery Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:50:18 +0100 To: Warren Block Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" , Brett Wynkoop , Ronald Klop X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:50:28 -0000 On 31 Jan 2013, at 15:12, Warren Block wrote: > If the man page is misleading or incomplete, it should be fixed. I agree. I think the discussion is just if it is misleading or incomplete.=20= > Based on the source, the mention of disk at the start is misleading. I'm not sure I follow your reasoning here. Maybe the brackets are unnecessar= y grammatically but I don't think they change the meaning of the sentence. A= s long as the processes in question were indeed in a short term uninterrupti= ble wait the man page seems to be completely correct. I assume you see the s= entence as having a different meaning though I'm afraid despite re-reading I= still can't see an alternative interpretation.=20 Anyway I don't want to get into a bike shed debate. I think the man page has= described the presumed situation quite well but if others want it changed t= o something else I don't mind as long as its no worse than what we have now.= =20 Andrew=