Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 20:01:38 -0600 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: vim language bindings Message-ID: <EF17FA68-EE00-44C7-993A-FAE6ADE0028C@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <51521c10-b5c7-a72b-acc4-b6a599cd012c@freebsd.org> References: <B6701333-79B0-460F-88E8-66BAFAC1CC38@adamw.org> <51521c10-b5c7-a72b-acc4-b6a599cd012c@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 13 Oct, 2017, at 19:59, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > On 14/10/17 12:21 am, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> I'm trying to get a feel for how many people utilize utilize vim's = language bindings. Note that this does NOT include syntax highlighting, = indenting, or anything related to editing language-specific files. This = is calling external scripting languages and interactive debugging within = vim. >>=20 >> Right now, vim installs Lua, Perl, Python, Ruby, and TCL for = everybody, and I'm not sure whether anybody actually intentionally uses = Lua or TCL anymore. Python hooks are definitely staying, but if you use = any other language bindings, please reply and tell me which ones. >>=20 >> Thanks! >>=20 >> # Adam >>=20 >>=20 > One hopes vim-lite does not install those, right? vim-lite is just console vim with the language bindings turned off. It's = not actually any lighter. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EF17FA68-EE00-44C7-993A-FAE6ADE0028C>