From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 09:27:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688F916A4CE; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51DB43D41; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:27:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) i0KHPWsm062273; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:25:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Sergey Matveychuk In-Reply-To: <400D6379.5010602@ciam.ru> References: <1074590694.85583.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <400D2939.5090203@fillmore-labs.com> <1074617147.757.16.camel@gyros> <400D6379.5010602@ciam.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Wzsyh+mJx/U0ztfkPoyp" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Message-Id: <1074619626.757.38.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:27:07 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway cc: Eivind Eklund cc: Oliver Eikemeier Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New bsd.*.mk changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:27:22 -0000 --=-Wzsyh+mJx/U0ztfkPoyp Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 12:20, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >>>Type: FEATURE > >>> > >>>Title: Add per-port persistent build options with a menu-driven > >>>front-end > [snipped] > >>>PR: > >>> > >>>Submitted by: eivind > [snipped] > > What's the general consensus on this (is there one)? What about ports >=20 > Sadly, we've seen no PR before and couldn't discuss it. Apparently, that's not true. This was brought up a while ago and bikeshedded to death. To some extent, I think it's better to get _something_ in the tree than wasting time complaining about design such that nothing gets done. Joe >=20 > --- > Sem. --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-Wzsyh+mJx/U0ztfkPoyp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBADWTqb2iPiv4Uz4cRAuw6AJ47plKlAhSffL3+vO/SYa/A9yybowCghntJ TXDhDwQ2YFK8MXoB4UVhpmU= =hxX1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Wzsyh+mJx/U0ztfkPoyp--