From owner-freebsd-hardware  Fri Jan 31 15:11:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA17934
          for hardware-outgoing; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:11:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA17926
          for <freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA01583; Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:10:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701312310.PAA01583@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: iain@heist.demon.co.uk (Iain Baird)
cc: root@itol.com (Ralph R. Rye), freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Qustion About Intel EtherExpress 100B 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 31 Jan 1997 22:27:09 GMT."
             <Mutt.19970131222709.iain@heist.demon.co.uk> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 15:10:18 -0800
Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>By 'any' do you mean any Ethernet driver?
>
>Full duplex works fine here with the de0 driver and two Kingston KNE40BT
>cards connected with a crossover cable.  The interface must be configured
>with the 'link1' parameter.  Details below.  Look, no collisions!

   Hmmm. That's interesting if it also actually works with an ethernet switch.
Last I heard, the driver needed a few changes before it would work properly
in full duplex.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project