From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 21 6:57:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A6737B401 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta03bw.bigpond.com (mta03bw.bigpond.com [139.134.6.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6497143E6A for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:57:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leighv@roq.com) Received: from michael ([144.135.24.84]) by mta03bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta03bw Jul 16 2002 22:47:55) with SMTP id H4C43W00.DSW; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:57:32 +1000 Received: from CPE-144-132-93-105.vic.bigpond.net.au ([144.132.93.105]) by bwmam06.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0n 53/8895212); 21 Oct 2002 23:57:32 Message-ID: <006b01c27909$db37f7e0$2d01a8c0@michael> From: "Leigh V" To: , "FBSDQ" References: Subject: Re: Alternative to NATD or IPNAT for cable connection. Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:57:55 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You can use my Ipfilter+Ipnat and DHCP setup script. Its designed for max security minimum fuss nat + stateful firewalling. And can also be just a start up firewall template for a tighter firewall setup. http://www.roq.com/bsd/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "JoeB" To: "FBSDQ" Cc: "freebsd-isp@FreeBSD. ORG" Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 11:03 PM Subject: Alternative to NATD or IPNAT for cable connection. > Help please, I looking for a software port that does NAT > (network address translation). Before getting cable I used user > PPP for dial up ISP with NAT function and then IPFW with > keep-state rules. This worked great because NAT was being done > outside of IPFW. Once I went to cable with DHCP I had to also go > to IPFW with NATD. NATD has problems with IPFW keep-state rules > where rules are mis-matched because of IPFW getting confused between > private and public ip address. > > Does anybody know of an stand-a-lone NAT program? > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message