From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 18 20:24:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703801065694 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:24:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f173.google.com (mail-iw0-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E4A8FC0C for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:24:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so520340iwn.18 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.11.200 with SMTP id u8mr1224765ibu.123.1290111848183; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:24:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.143.15 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:23:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101118161701.GB31322@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <20101117220248.GC53079@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101118161701.GB31322@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:23:47 -0500 Message-ID: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposal for a new option framework X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:24:09 -0000 > Just pulled your latest changes, and now it takes more arrow keys to kill > it, but two tabs still does the trick. Revision 88ca1975d4dd fixed usage() Revision 208207ddab2a fixed some bugs relating to outputting the option names Revision 77b56ebf5150 added some more sanity checking for the option names I'm still seeking more testing in a wide range of scenarios as the goal is to integrate this into the base system (or at least the ports system). If you see any bugs or issues please let me know so they can be fixed. One small note: the D4P program is not designed to be run from the command line on a regular basis - the intent is for that ports system to generate the command line and run it like 'make config' currently does. -- Eitan Adler