Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:46:58 +1200 From: Thomas Munro <munro@ip9.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: yuripv <yuripv@yuripv.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tracking CLDR version in collation definitions Message-ID: <CADLWmXX71RKULPca%2B_zu10znP-B8bt9jMKv3FvbwbUqxfuJjyg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180908172819.GE3161@kib.kiev.ua> References: <CADLWmXWY0doSQ-7uoBC0JUzCgZTx9iw-k_viYWB7ze8Pi7R8gw@mail.gmail.com> <1536416542111-0.post@n6.nabble.com> <20180908172819.GE3161@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 September 2018 at 05:28, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 07:22:22AM -0700, yuripv wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> I think this makes perfect sense, yes, and not aware of any other way of >> having the data version information. >> >> There are some nits in the man page changes, but that can of course be taken >> care of during review. > > At least, the new symbols must not go into the FBSD_1.3 namespace, but > into the current namespace of the HEAD at the tome of commit. I believe > it will be FBSD_1.6 when the patch has a chance to hit the tree. Thanks, I'll bear that in mind for the next revision. > I also think that more specific name, indicating that this is a FreeBSD > unique function, should be used. Yeah, I was wondering about that. This may sound a bit too ambitious, but my plan is to produce a working version in a real operating system, and then make a proposal the Austin Group for a future POSIX revision.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLWmXX71RKULPca%2B_zu10znP-B8bt9jMKv3FvbwbUqxfuJjyg>