Date: Tue, 02 Apr 1996 17:06:40 +0000 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SO_KEEPALIVE Message-ID: <1208.828464800@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Apr 1996 10:10:14 CST." <199604021610.KAA26215@brasil.moneng.mei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Question, stupid, nonetheless a question: > > > > > > Does anybody see any advantage to allowing for a way to set a systemwide > > > SO_KEEPALIVE default of ON? > > > > make a sysctl variable for this. It's really easy. > > Yeah, well, that's nice :-) I wanted to know if there would be any general > interest. I'm not a kernel hacker so it would take a bit of expenditure of > effort on my part to figure all that out, yadda yadda yadda, and if it was > something that would not make it into -current, I would opt for a quick and > dirty hack. > > Can anyone suggest an appropriate name for such a variable? sysctl.inet.tcp.keepalive taking a boolean argument. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1208.828464800>