Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:19:10 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> To: stan <stanb@panix.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: sendmail from porst vs vase sendmail (problems) Message-ID: <593839A5-158B-4C49-9A6D-EBB636FE33F3@orthanc.ca> In-Reply-To: <20050902000941.GA23552@teddy.fas.com> References: <20050901015130.GA10290@teddy.fas.com> <0DB2B2D5-2C8C-4FAB-AD33-27DD092DBD13@orthanc.ca> <20050901091652.GA22956@teddy.fas.com> <A7BC8171-4977-4D43-B213-E8F0937A37C2@orthanc.ca> <20050902000941.GA23552@teddy.fas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sep 1, 2005, at 5:09 PM, stan wrote: > Isn't that a bit extereme? Espically as it will probably overwrite > all teh perl modules, and binaries we have installed from ports. It won't touch anything built from ports. > > There must be a way to build just a subsection of the main tree, no? Yes, you can manually run mtree to recreate the directory structures for sendmail, then selectively run make on each of the sendmail components, then make install the program binaries, but it's a lot easier to just buildworld+installworld. That way you're guaranteed to get the same state as if you had just installed (which is what you asked for). --lyndon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?593839A5-158B-4C49-9A6D-EBB636FE33F3>