From nobody Wed Jan 31 11:35:02 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TQ0Mx2YRnz58Kwj; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marietto2008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TQ0Mx24pJz4RCG; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marietto2008@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a35e65df2d8so376076266b.0; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:35:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706700940; x=1707305740; darn=freebsd.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IErXxhnr7Sr3iuRkIP+bNCT9P+lyiJi7K5wIctH9pCQ=; b=LpfarKJwa0DzMHG7DEGDrSXAQm+ltSyG26jVHXwcwhSyhjKCTGDQP116f4ceJTiuaA vwoo1frgmRVcwSRBMpa2zc/vaeobSkSOB4dkhK3ahLDI/agU4il3aT4wBi4KdNGQ/aQu k54/yNEpvp6gqQvzZ9KHK28jCp8Y0lfE7IxhDwojeLLBr9GwKY5p2ufkM9EJMep6n/eC OUgshVMgUSuYIycopBGmJRnVLHsxgSXgPSzFDtRY7Didvn+Ccb/+GV3VDz9R0QVl50t9 emsbAbONYEJI8wojv6qo8iwfFeJCEHdQdiq2EvN/syOqNjbOVVQ3xwdkNdAmy9HsVcJ8 1siQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706700940; x=1707305740; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=IErXxhnr7Sr3iuRkIP+bNCT9P+lyiJi7K5wIctH9pCQ=; b=gFkfP57gnjFUiX2nOFUzLjQ+mI3MziVbAoXVArscaszL6TeibaRGH8DMpCXUhdPQea jt+J6/QXnYZQsCOjir4uuw75BoRnpQHm+Fq+BxWYBceje9ljAl373VhpylsS2S3ySgTn 8JuiYdWLEVJdhZCARHr+lAzy7HNPhObPvwVQVOvI1wkJ8xPiY41mYxRjbG9RXpPsRy8k gC2ECCHuTLY/a5bCyWVELPvTrNk6O9TXIITtoy9GhG0r+VSLuwqtusd2X+9LX8TklEwh D8da/zUzi7WF4l2U9O0BKm2l6twu+5BTSyJQHlhVivYMmz7wP7htqbZT1NAAdGIIXa6O Xtcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyOSNE1vyU8CEmHAtxNm90d6Ws7yCC8a2YMMtbSfoRs+Ycjlv44 mc+aZLrodoylokjvBnSNzAY+IY/ej1GcH9+x+yeIt30ataojXMC9suew3TxRm+aNKhsGguDcoyc e0NqjfbEJEXb59ufXOtddqWGiFIo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGFM8zgkJSyB2q1hiXS4r8mphdY7yGpchl9Fr50578iFlW5B4itXMaw3v6bC3eTBG6zP0UPMHuE4h3m+O9u6uw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:171b:b0:a31:1907:2fe8 with SMTP id le27-20020a170907171b00b00a3119072fe8mr957060ejc.48.1706700939343; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:35:39 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Technical discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <80d527f-df83-5657-6a2a-262156e08440@puchar.net> In-Reply-To: <80d527f-df83-5657-6a2a-262156e08440@puchar.net> From: Mario Marietto Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 12:35:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: set : illegal option -o pipefail error while trying to upgrade pkg. To: Wojciech Puchar Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , freebsd-hackers Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003a3be306103c4790" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TQ0Mx24pJz4RCG X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US] --0000000000003a3be306103c4790 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What I haven't understood is why you are talking about newer ports when the only thing I do is to update ports using the same FreeBSD version,in this case 10.4. I mean,upgrading ports without upgrading the version of FreeBSD,can't mean to use newer ports,since I don't use a newer version of the OS. On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:29=E2=80=AFAM Wojciech Puchar wrote: > quick dirty fix is to install bash and link /bin/sh to /usr/local/bin/bas= h > (it may break something) > other - manually compile later /bin/sh and replace. > > the problem is that newer ports needs newer /bin/sh > --=20 Mario. --0000000000003a3be306103c4790 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What I haven't understood is why you are talking about= newer ports when the only thing I do is to update ports using the same Fre= eBSD version,in this case 10.4. I mean,upgrading ports without upgrading th= e version of FreeBSD,can't mean to use newer ports,since I don't us= e a newer version of the OS.

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 11:29=E2=80=AFAM Wo= jciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> wrote:
qui= ck dirty fix is to install bash and link /bin/sh to /usr/local/bin/bash (it may break something)
other - manually compile later /bin/sh and replace.

the problem is that newer ports needs newer /bin/sh


--
Mario.
--0000000000003a3be306103c4790--